October 2006 Archives

Yahoo waking up?

29 October 2006 - 09:42 AM | Permalink

From time to time, I do a little dance with Yahoo!. Some particularly egregious spammer using a 'yahoo.com' mail address to service their spam operation will annoy me to the point that I fire up a spam report and send it off to Yahoo!'s abuse account, with a note to say "This unsolicited message advertises a reply address at 'yahoo.com'.". A few days later, I will get a boilerplate message back that says "We have determined that this was not sent from Yahoo! Mail ..." and follows it up with advice on how to identify the 'real' sender's ISP.

Continue reading 'Yahoo waking up?'

A new low

28 October 2006 - 01:18 PM | Permalink

One of the problems with running this site is the large number of people who are apparently unable to tell the difference between a site about spam and a spam site. They type the name of a stock spam into Google, get sent to my page about that stock and immediately conclude that they have found the source of the spam. From then, it's only a matter of seconds before they find the 'Mail Spamnation' button, and fire off a demand to be unsubscribed (or, in some cases, a torrent of quasi-legal threats and abuse). Ha! Take that, you spamming bastards!

Continue reading 'A new low'

That explains it

25 October 2006 - 08:56 AM | Permalink

Marketplace had a brief piece about stock spam recently. I think Leonard Richardson nails it with his answer to the question about who buys spamvertized stocks:

I think it's the same kind of people who keep falling for the "I've got this money and I need to get it from Africa" scams. And it's . . . it's kind of the same principle. People think that they've stumbled onto some secret that they can exploit for money.

I think he's right. All the sucker pitches - 419's, MLM, fake-check scams, spammed stocks - are targeting the people who are convinced that they really can get rich quick if they just stumble on the right secret. And no amount of logic or experience is going to persuade them that it won't work. They believe because they need to.

This is bad news, because it means that the current frenetic level of stock spam may not die down. I'd been assuming that eventually the word would get out that buying spammed stocks is a sucker's game. God knows, I've been trying hard enough to spread that message myself. But even though most people probably now know about 419's, I've not seen any falloff in the number of messages I get from self-styled relatives of dead dictators, fictional bank managers and fake lotteries. Apparently there are enough idiots out there to keep the game alive. If Richardson is right that stock spam works on the same principle, any hopes that stock spam will die a natural death in the near future are probably misplaced.

Lies, damned lies and ...

19 October 2006 - 08:12 AM | Permalink

A lot of stock spam consists of a company press release, padded out with the usual claims that the stock is an "IMMEDIATE STRONG BUY" or "WILL EXPLODE ON MONDAY". The press release, lifted off Yahoo! Finance or PRNewsWire, provides most of the spammer's copy. He just has to add a few wildly optimistic claims about expected performance, some hashbuster text and a fake email address, and his work is done. If you ignore the wild claims designed to make you think that this is a stock worth buying, the actual information is usually accurate — or at least as accurate as penny stock press releases ever are.

Continue reading 'Lies, damned lies and ...'

The return of "Hi Bob"

18 October 2006 - 08:15 AM | Permalink

Stock spammers in particular seem to like "Hi Bob" messages, spams that pretend to be personal messages sent to the wrong person by mistake, breathlessly extolling the virtues of something that the sender just happens to have discovered. A spammer currently pushing Texhoma (TXHE.PK) has apparently decided that "Hi Bob" messages are the future of stock spam, and is pumping out dozens of them, all featuring the same boilerplate text filled in with randomly generated names.

Continue reading 'The return of "Hi Bob"'

Paging Mr Pyrrhus

11 October 2006 - 08:06 AM | Permalink

The big spam news today is that bulkmailer E360Insight is trying to persuade a federal judge to order the suspension of the spamhaus.org domain name. This follows a court case in which E360Insight won an $11.7 million default judgment against Spamhaus, claiming that Spamhaus had wrongly listed them as a spammer. Spamhaus did not contest the action, on the grounds that US courts had no jurisdiction over the UK-based anti-spam organization.

Continue reading 'Paging Mr Pyrrhus'

An offer you can refuse

09 October 2006 - 12:50 PM | Permalink

The fake check scammers try hard, but every so often their English lets them down. Something about the following pitch tells me that the company name wasn't dreamed up by a native English speaker:

Good day Sir/Madam,
We inform you about new vacancies in Violent Cooperation Company ...

Circularity

04 October 2006 - 01:32 PM | Permalink
  1. Spammer sends stock spam with 'somefakeaddress@someoneelsesdomain' in the 'From:' line
  2. One such spam (perhaps sent to a mailing list) is archived on a web page somewhere.
  3. Spammer's web-crawling robot crawls the page and sees the mail address.
  4. Spammer sends stock spam to 'somefakeaddress@someoneelsesdomain'.

This is not just a theoretical possibility. I've just seen it happen. The real irony is that it looks as if the crawler belonged to the same spammer who sent out the original message. In other words, the spammer is spamming non-existent addresses that he invented himself.


weblognewsstocksstatstoolsnoteslinksmisc